/me <thumps head> Very cool!  Thanks for the idea on options!

>
> It can be done quite easily.
>
>
> Two options:
>
>
> Preferred:
>
> Configure webmail to send messages directly to the appliances.
>
>
>
> Alternatively:
>
> Install a dumb SMTP mailer on "D" that listens on a port other than 25.
> Configure that dumb-mailer to forward all mail to the appliances.
> Configure
> webmail to send messages to the dumb mailer's listening port.
>
>
> webmail -SMTP-> "D" dumb-mailer listening on tcp:125(example) -SMTP->
> appliances via static SMTP route -SMTP-> back to "D" tcp:25 via static
> SMTP
> route for local deliveries
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ISP Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 4:41 PM
> To: vchkpw@inter7.com
> Subject: [vchkpw] How to route local delivery through a separate SMTP spam
> scanner
>
> A customer has challenged whether this can be done...
>
> Anti-SPAM appliances "A", "B", and "C" are available on an internal LAN
> via DNS round-robin through SMTP at "appliance.example.com"
>
> VPOPMAIL server "D" is on the same LAN.
>
> Customer has had a few local accounts that had their password guessed and
> spammers sent spam through webmail.
>
> Soooooooo............
>
> We're considering doing something inline to the delivery process that
> would 1) accept the authenticated user's email for remote/local delivery,
> 2) force that delivery off of box "D" to "A-C" over SMTP in ALL cases (not
> just remote), 3) Scan on "A-C", 4) return the inbound (local) mail back to
> "D" for further delivery to the locals.
>
> I realize this is pretty insane, but the customer isn't excited about
> adding a local spam daemon to "D" and would like to leverage the
> investment in the appliances "A-C" to control for local delivery abuses.
> The appliances are doing a nice job on SMTP scanning, but the vendor says
> that their appliance does not have a "port listener" (like a spamd daemon)
> that could answer a stream request - thus only SMTP will do.
>
> Ideas?  THANKS!  Dave.
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>



!DSPAM:48225a58120502068847775!

Reply via email to