Great. I've a message in "draft" on the charter, but will send that after this one.
So there's no confusion, Nathan - maybe you should resend the vote count to general noting the TLP vote is really closed and all -1's are resolved? Cheers, WILL On 9/25/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
To me, the vote to go TLP is done. I appreciate the respect and deference though. As for the -1, that's about the charter we'd propose to the board, and we still have a month, so I'm sure we'll come to consensus easily. geir Nathan Bubna wrote: > On 9/23/06, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Wow. Skip email for a day and there's a blizzard. I take Geir's >> comments pretty seriously though. >> >> To me, the most important part of this is the opportunity to grow the >> developer community. That's easy to say, of course. Technically, any >> committer in Jakarta now has svn commit rights to Velocity, and it >> hasn't seemed to make a difference. But by encouraging carefully >> selected projects to join the Velocity TLP, I think we'd see more >> energy and effort around Velocity core itself. >> >> What are those projects - how do we grow them - worthy of a separate >> thread. >> >> Process point -- should we put the vote on hold for a few days until >> we can discuss this and resolve Geir's -1? > > Not sure what it means to put a vote on hold and discuss it if that > isn't what we're already doing. I guess it's worth stating officially > though... ;-) > >> Best, >> WILL >> >> Maybe we can >> >> On 9/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Right - moving to TLP doesn't make a difference there, other than the >> > plan to bring in velocity related things into the project, which grows >> > the commiter base. >> > >> > geir >> > >> > Nathan Bubna wrote: >> > > No, that is not basically the reason. >> > > >> > > On 9/22/06, Daniel Dekany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> Saturday, September 23, 2006, 1:02:35 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > This vote closed sooner than expected. I was traveling and there >> > >> was no >> > >> > stated deadline. >> > >> [snip] >> > >> >> > >> So, Velocity will be TLP. Now, somebody correct me if I get it >> wrong, >> > >> but is the reason basically that its developer community was not >> > >> active enough, and being TLP would help to fix this situation? >> > >> >> > >> -- >> > >> Best regards, >> > >> Daniel Dekany >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> Forio Business Simulations >> >> Will Glass-Husain >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> www.forio.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
