Tim said: ... > > ah, yes, releases... some people like those, don't they? :) > Indeed. I just like the symmetry of version numbers 1.0/1.0 and 1.1/1.1 > ...heck, maybe we should quickly release Veltools 1.0 and then in quick > succession do 1.1b-1, 1.1b-2, 1.1-b3.
heh. and monkeys might... eh, nevermind. :) > > anyway, this sounds reasonable. maybe we should get a thread > > going on the dev list about release(s)/features/fixes/roadmap stuff. > Ha. Sure. (Didn't you try that a few months ago?) yeah, but i'm a slow learner. besides, this time i have some power to do something about those things. ... > > i think we do have a working lib for it, right? i haven't > > been made aware of any bugs at least. but i presume you want > > some sort of tagged/built/maintained/whatever branch, right? > Oh, I'm using the Veltools 0.whatever_is_in_CVS version right now and it > works without any major issues for me. :-) good, but feel free to post notice of minor issues too. > But an 'official' 1.0 release would prolly make other folks more warm > and fuzzy toward the code. it's true. and it also tends to generate visibility/publicity/sense-of-value for a project. Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
