Actually, when we first started talking about all of this, I tried to register a vim wiki site on WIkia (http://www.wikia.com). I didn't get any response for a while, but about a week ago, they finally let me know that we could in fact have our own wiki on that site. Here's the address:
* http://www.wikia.com/wiki/Vim It has a lot of the advantages that you get with a Sourceforge wiki as far as I can tell, and they have some real cutting-edge spam-fighting modules. So yes, Sourceforge is a better option than it used to be, but my understanding was that some people on the list were unhappy with Soureforge's availability. I'm not saying that Wikia will be better in that respect, but at least it's not Sourceforge. What do you guys think? On Sunday 06 May 2007 08:32, Martin Krischik wrote: > Hello Vim Developers, > Hello Vim Users, > > some time ago there was a huge discussion about a Vim-Wiki. In the end > WikiBooks has the highest support. Still some whished for a Vim-only-Wiki > instead of beeing part of a larger project. > > For this a new option is not open: SourceForge ended the beta for there > wiki support. We can now have a Vim-only-Wiki with just one mouse click. In > fact we could have several because there are several Vim projects on > SourceForge. > > It would be just for us, has a propper user maintainance, (desaster) backup > by SourceForge themself and it can be personalised by CSS. > > All it takes to start is a project admin to activate the wiki. > > Martin > > [1] http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Learning_the_vi_editor/Vim
