Great. I checked in the patch from Gerd Wachsmuth (as is). It's revision 1107.
--Ted On 08/18/2010 02:52 PM, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:51:58AM -0400, Ted Pavlic wrote: > >> Either way, I'd be excited to see this merged into the devel branch >> ASAP. I currently have my old version (which deferred to the nested > > you should now have commit access to the SVN repo on sourceforge, so you can > commit the patch. Maybe you could also commit other patches, if there is a > consensus for them here on the mailing list. Otherwise I hope to spend some > time > again on vim-latex within a month. > > Regards > Till > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Vim-latex-devel mailing list > Vim-latex-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel -- Ted Pavlic <t...@tedpavlic.com> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ Vim-latex-devel mailing list Vim-latex-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vim-latex-devel
