On 17/09/2007, thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I'm no vim developer but read this list nevertheless from time > to > time. Frankly speaking, I do not fully understand what this is about. > Why do you want a new name for files distributed in vba format other > than vba (or vimball)?
The main reason people seemed to agree on when it was discussed is that this way, you will not miss out on useful stuff that you might miss if it is not in a bundle. > Besides, I personally prefer the finer granularity of vim's plugins > over > Emacs's modes. Personally, I think that the perfect bundle is one that will let you choose what you want to enable and what not while keeping reasonable defaults. Also, if you have good, modularized code, it should still be easy to rip out parts you like. Richard --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
