Posted by Jonathan Adler:
A Holiday Gift for EPA:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_12_28-2009_01_03.shtml#1230481210


   This past week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit gave
   the Environmental Protection Agency a little Christmas present. On
   [1]rehearing in North Carolina v. EPA, the court agreed not to vacate
   the Bush Administration�s Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), an
   ambitious effort to create a regional emission trading regime for
   several conventional air pollutants. In its [2]initial decision, the
   court invalidated CAIR due to �more than several fatal flaws in the
   rule.� On rehearing, at the request of the EPA, environmentalist
   groups and several states, the court reaffirmed its substantive
   holding, but then remanded CAIR without vacatur so as to �temporarily
   preserve the environmental values� the rule was supposed to advance.

   On remand, the EPA will have its work cut out for it. CAIR was always
   a bit of a gamble. While there is a strong policy case for a regional
   trading system, it was never clear such a system could be created
   under the existing Clean Air Act. Indeed, the Bush Administration�s
   original plan was to create the trading system as part of a
   legislative package to amend the Clean Air Act. It was only after
   legislative efforts failed that the Bush EPA sought to implement the
   policy administratively.

   The court�s decision likely leaves the Obama EPA few options. I am
   skeptical that a regional trading system can be adopted without
   legislation. The court�s decision also highlights the difficulty the
   Obama EPA would have were it to try and create a greenhouse gas
   emission trading system administratively. The Clean Air Act is a
   heavily prescriptive statute, and it does not leave that much room for
   administrative innovation.

   In the meantime, the Bush EPA can savor this little bit of legal
   relief. While CAIR may not be legal, it is one of the few [3]Bush air
   pollution regulations that will still be on the books when they leave
   office.

References

   1. http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/200812/05-1244-1155490.pdf
   2. 
http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200807/05-1244-1127017.pdf
   3. http://volokh.com/posts/chain_1219156411.shtml

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to