Ladies and gentlemen,
The truth is, I plead, to a large degree, ignorance of this Focardi&Rossi
matter.
It had been originally brought to my attention as a patent, and then I
pointed out to the person it was merely a patent application and I said,
"So what, don't bother me."
Even granted patents don't mean that the devices work as stated. Just look
at Seth Putterman's patent for sonofusion.
So here's my question for all you science hounds: Have Focardi&Rossi
actually published a real paper or presented one at a science conference?
Has the Focardi&Rossi paper/work been vetted, in any way, in the formal
science channel or has it just been hyped up on some bogus Web site that is
masquerading as some sort of Journal?
"Journal or Nuclear Physics"? Really??? Can someone please tell me
something about this?
http://whois.domaintools.com/journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
And can someone please explain why the good Dr. Melich, allegedly
representing the entire "DoD", is involved with this?
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?page_id=2
And isn't there some mention in the paper of this having to do with the
"DoD" yet the paper provides no details?
And a "Board of Advisers" comprising the key authors of this "paper?" Is
this a con or what?
Will somebody puhleeze tell me that someone is not running a false flag to
discredit Ni-H work.
Will somebody puhleeze tell me that someone did not go to Focardi and Rossi
and represent himself as the "DoD" and thereby test and validate inflated
claims to set them up for a fall.
Steve
