No dear Jones, Focardi has looked inside the reactors starting 1994. It is an other professor who made the black box measurements.
I like your mode of thinking re methods of crookery, but do not think they are realistic- in this case. Randy is a different subject. Peter On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > We are talking past each other. > > > > The operative word is “proof”. Since even Focardi himself admits that he is > not permitted to see inside the reactor, and since chemical reactions could > provide this level of excess for a few hours, or since an fairly safe alpha > emitter could provide it for longer - and since no one can be sure that the > reactants have not been replenished periodically – there is no firm proof > yet. > > > > Don’t get me wrong, I do think he has something. But why not let’s all get > on the same page and clear the record before the skeptics do it for us? > > > > BTW - I also think that Randell Mills has something valid and similar. Are > they different? If nothing else, maybe Rossi will force Mills’ hand. > > > > Jones > > > > > > *From:* Jed Rothwell > > > > Jones Beene wrote: > > I strongly suggest that nothing … absolutely NOTHING … seen so far, > proves that he does have it. I think he does, but that is only based on > things not in the record. > > > > Well, I do not speak Italian, but based on the blogger's comments and the > caliber of the people who worked on this project, I disagree. I would say > there are plenty of technical indications this claim is real. > > > > >
