Did you read my last email? Rathke stated a critique, Mills answered it. To me that doesn't look like Mills is mute. You would not get a debate like a presidential debate though, that's a stupid way to debate. No there would of cause be an exchange of letters postings or papers. Mills has indeed answered Rathke, there is no acknowledge of this rebutal and he looks mute. Again that is an illusion as I just showed you. Now Mills has gone out and published his critique of QM in a paper, many years ago, I did a search for any paper that referenced his claim to get a view what the proponents has to say, Nothing. So you are dead wrong, it's the QM folks that are mute.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It is a shame that we don't have a serious heated debate between nobell >> lauriates and Mills regarding these matters, it would be a great show. In >> stead there is a speaking nothing. >> > > Mills would not say anything. There would be no debate. > > >> My take on this is therefore that Mills is right. >> > > ?? > > Eric > >
