Hello Mark,
If we consider that < Sample1 > is fuel and "Sample2" is ash, then there is a clue that 64Ni could be converted to 65Cu in the Parkhomov reactor! Let me show the maths: If other Ni isotopes don't react then the quantities of Ni for each isotope stay the same except for 64Ni: 58Ni: 64.03 60Ni: 26.34 61Ni: 1.22 62Ni: 3.99 64Ni: 2.85 Total = 98.43 (1.57 is assumed to be converted into 65Cu) And in percentage, it gives then: 58Ni: 65.05 60Ni: 26.76 61Ni: 1.24 62Ni: 4.05 Those values are in the range of the sample2 data for the Ni, except a slight deviation for 60Ni . more 60Ni found in the ash than calculated. In the Lugano analysis, the 64Ni has disappeared. All converted in 65Cu? Arnaud _____ From: Mark Jurich [mailto:jur...@hotmail.com] Sent: jeudi 23 avril 2015 11:51 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Re: Parkhomov Ash Analysis Discussion - Preliminary FYI: Typo Fixed (30.1 -> 30.9 in Natural State 65Cu Cell) From: Mark Jurich <mailto:jur...@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 1:28 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov Ash Analysis Discussion - Preliminary FYI: Here is a link to the latest updated Elemental <> Isotope Analysis in Excel XLSX SpreadSheet (Sheets 1 & 2) Format: http://tinyurl.com/lcnudcv Mark Jurich From: Mark Jurich <mailto:jur...@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 12:02 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Parkhomov Ash Analysis Discussion - Preliminary As many of you know, some preliminary Elemental Analysis (SIMS?) and ICP-MS of Parkhomov Ash/Fuel were released during ICCF-19 in Padua, Italy. At the FaceBook MFMP Site, some pictures of the analysis were taken and posted: http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/04/21/mfmp-publishes-parkhomovs-fuel-analysis -video-of-parkhomov-discussion/ >From the Elemental Analysis, it roughly looks like Ni is lost with a gain in Cu, but we all know how careful one has to be analyzing this. Some of the Nickel might have coated something other than the "ash." Due to some issue, the Li Analysis is incomplete and will most likely be resolved soon. I believe Parkhomov has 2 more Fuel/Ash Analysis being undertaken at this time, also (EDX and ?). An incomplete picture of the ICP-MS Analysis roughly shows the following (amongst other things & if we assume Rows 1 & 2 are Ash Analysis and Row 3 is the Fuel Analysis): https://www.facebook.com/MartinFleischmannMemorialProject/photos/p.959743037 389729/959743037389729 6Li -> 7Li 58Ni -> 64Ni Obviously, it's not as simple as this, but I wanted throw a "bone" out there for us to chew on. My guess is that Row 1 is a Best Run, Row 2 is a Pretty Good Run and Row 3 is the Starting Fuel (since Li, Ni & Cu are at almost Natural Abundances). Tomorrow morning I will talk to a Russian American and try to decipher the Cyrillic, since no one at the MFMP Site has done it yet... 6Li is depleted by half, with the difference showing up as 7Li. 64Ni shows a gain of about 5 with the loss roughly showing up in 58Ni. 65Cu Values & ? seem to be cut off in the picture, and hopefully we will get this data soon. What do YOU think is happening? As soon as I get a chance, I will post further links from the MFMP and E-Cat World Sites for the Internet-Challenged amongst us. Mark Jurich
