Over the many hours that the MFMP reactor was heated its pressure of hydrogen first increased rapidly as the hydride degased and then the pressure of the gas in the envelope stabilized.
But as the hours of the reactor heatup pased, the pressure of the gas steadily decreased. This behavior looks like a cycle where a hydride solid first turned to a gas then gradually reverted by into a solid form as the temperature of the reactor reached it maximum temperature. That high temperature solid form of hydrogen is maximized at a temperature just over 1000C. There is no theory of hydrino formation that predicts the formation of high temperature hydrino formation into a solid form. If there is a rebirth of the LENR reaction after a reburn of the reactor, it is produced by this unknow form of solid hydrogen that remains as a residual fraction in the reactor's ash. On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > The 47-hour live test by the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project on > their Glow reactor has shown (apparent) excess heat - not conclusive but > interesting, since there is also a growing divergence between the fueled > and unfueled reactors, which is increasing during the run. Exactly what > is expected of a gainful situation. > > The conclusion of a thermal anomaly is to be furthered by a “post-test > calibration run”… “planned where there will be a run with the hydrogen > removed from the fueled reactor. The data from that post-test will be as > important as the data from the fueled test.” > > COMMENT: HUGE POTENTIAL MISTAKE! … yet of course, if the gain does not > continue, then there is no mistake but … there is the likelihood that > some gain will continue. > > The post calibration test can be deceptive, and in fact the > interpretation of those results will be extremely counterproductive - in > the likely circumstance that reduced but still anomalous thermal gain > continues. > > If this reaction depends on a population of fractional hydrogen or f/H – which > is “below ground state hydrogen” often called the hydrino state, and > > which is a very strong contender for the gain which is witnessed – then > that active material will remain in the reactor after pumping away H2. It > will have become magnetically bound to the nickel- even when all the > gaseous hydrogen is removed from the reactor. > > Thus, thermal gain will continue – which will lead MFMP to assume that > their calibration was in error – when in fact the error is simply in the > assumption that eliminating hydrogen gas will de-fuel the reactor. > > IT WILL NOT to the extent that f/H is involved. Of course, if the gain d > isappears after degassing, then f/H was not involved in the anomaly and > this reinforces their original conclusion, and also eliminates f/H as the > active element. > > Jones >
