Something more interesting wit rf

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:John_Kanzius_Produces_Hydrogen_from_Salt_Water_Using_Radio_Waves



-----Original Message-----
From: David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 6:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying...


 You recall me being shocked by that darned vhf transmitter?   Actually it was 
a burn, but it proved that I have earned my metal as an experienced RF power 
engineer.   Most of the guys that I know who have actual experience have been 
burned on at least one occasion.
 
 Have you ever been RF burned?  Have you ever designed a transmitter?  Have you 
ever put a system into operation?  What are your expert qualifications?
 
 If you can not answer most of these in a positive manner then you should be 
trying to learn from those that have.    There is no crime in playing with 
statistics as long as no damage is done to an important industry by someone who 
has limited knowledge.
 
 We are here to help you keep grounded in true theory as long as you are 
willing to listen my friend.   You really should start by understanding how 
pulse modulation of an RF carrier functions.  There is no radiation of the 
pulse repetition frequency of any measurable magnitude.  The fact that the 
radar antenna system can not radiate efficiently at that frequency should be 
sufficient to settle that question.  Is that not obvious?
 
 Dave
    
    
   
   
    
   
   
-----Original Message-----   
 From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>   
 To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>   
 Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 2:43 pm   
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying...   
    
    
     
 Last time I argued with you about this you told me you got shocked by an RF 
antenna      
       
      
      
 You proved my point.      
      
       
      
      
 I loved radio, but I like Pandora better and that comes through a cable (at 
least to my house :))      
      
       
      
      
 Stewart      
     
     
      
      
 On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:41 PM, David Roberson       <dlrober...@aol.com> 
wrote:       
       
        Not really Stewart.  I have worked on radios and theory for many years 
and I understand it quite well.  You are missing the point about the pulse 
repetition rate and its relationship to the radiated signal.  The low 
frequencies are not radiated by a very band limited high frequency RF 
transmission system.   That is trivial and anyone with RF experience 
understands it.   You are not well informed about how these systems operate and 
are making assumptions that do not exist.
 
 Have you spent many years designing radios or putting systems into operation?  
You should let all the vortex readers know about your background in RF 
transmitters so that they can judge the accuracy of your predictions.   I am 
happy to discuss my career in that field.
 
 Much of the modern world depends upon RF communications and I am quite proud 
of the work I have done in that area.
 
 Dave
          
          
         
         
          
         
         
          
         
         
          -----Original Message-----
 From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>
           
           
 To: vortex-l <            vortex-l@eskimo.com>            
 Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 2:00 pm            
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying...            
            
            
             
 No, I have concentrated on pulsed radars, which pulse at 0-1000 Hz, considered 
very low frequencies.              
               
              
              
 Dave you are generalizing and have done no research yourself.              
              
               
              
              
 Here is some:              
              
               
              
              
               
http://darkmattersalot.com/2015/05/19/and-you-thought-the-bp-oil-spill-was-bad/ 
              
              
             
             
              
              
 On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:55 PM, David Roberson               
<dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:               
               
                Of course if you limit your impact to those transmitters that 
communicate with submarines then these very low frequency signals do travel 
into the deeper water.  But, so far it appears that you have placed all type of 
radars, etc. into the same category, which is not reasonable.
 
 From what I read in the news there are ocean dead zones in many locations that 
have little or nothing at all to do with RF transmissions.   Many reefs are 
dying where no transmitters are located nearby to contribute to the problem.  
The concern about warming waters is a major one that is often used to explain 
the dying and that is more likely than high frequency RF transmissions.
 
 Dave
                  
                  
                 
                 
                  
                 
                 
                  
                 
                 
                  -----Original Message-----
 From: James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>
 To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
                    Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 10:07 am
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying...
 
                   
                   
                    
                     
 Thanks for the numbers.                       
                       
                      
                      
 This should be relatively straight forward to test:                      
                      
                       
                      
                      
 Set up two salt water aquariums supporting comparable coral populations.  Run 
them for a year or so to see they are stable.  Then subject one of them to low 
frequency EM radiation.                      
                      
                       
                      
                      
 PS:  What I mean contraction in terms is that "pulse" implies high frequency 
components and, indeed, is usually illustrated by time differential on a square 
wave to filter out the low frequency components.  However, your point is well 
taken -- a short duration transmission of a high power low frequency signal 
will penetrate salt water -- with a very drastic reduction in power with depth, 
as your numbers show.                       
                       
                        
                        
 On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:50 AM, ChemE Stewart                         
<cheme...@gmail.com> wrote:                         
                         
                          
 Low frequency pulse.                           
                            
                           
                           
 Also, we are not communicating with the marine life and coral reef, the 
evidence is mounting that 2 terrawatts of effective isotropic radiated power 
(EIRP) in a local area scattered by the overhead atmosphere is mildly shocking 
the marine life through electromagnetic induction and conduction through the 
salt water near the surface as it "grounds out" into the ocean. You can't fool 
mother nature sort of thing.                           
                           
                            
                           
                           
 Here is a model of induced electrical currents in seawater surface around just 
one ship's antennas.  Now imagine 27 high power coastal based radars/antennas 
and 45 warship radars/antennas in one area.                            
                           
                            
                           
                           
                            
http://darkmattersalot.com/2015/05/14/how-cousteau-and-noaa-killed-the-reef/    
                        
                           
                           
                            
                           
                           
                            
                           
                           
                            
                             
                              
                               
Effects of Electrical Current* on the Body [3]
                              
                              
                               
Current
                               
Reaction
                              
                              
                               
1 milliamp
                               
Just a faint tingle.
                              
                              
                               
5 milliamps
                               
Slight shock felt. Disturbing, but not painful. Most people can “let go.” 
However, strong involuntary movements can cause injuries.
                              
                              
                               
6-25 milliamps (women)†
 9-30 milliamps (men)
                               
Painful shock. Muscular control is lost. This is the range where “freezing 
currents” start. It may not be possible to “let go.”
                              
                              
                               
50-150 milliamps
                               
Extremely painful shock, respiratory arrest (breathing stops), severe muscle 
contractions. Flexor muscles may cause holding on; extensor muscles may cause 
intense pushing away. Death is possible.
                              
                              
                               
1,000-4,300 milliamps (1-4.3 amps)
                               
Ventricular fibrillation (heart pumping action not rhythmic) occurs. Muscles 
contract; nerve damage occurs. Death is likely.
                              
                              
                               
10,000 milliamps (10 amps)
                               
Cardiac arrest and severe burns occur. Death is probable.
                              
                             
                            
                           
                           
                            
                             
                              
                             
                             
                              
                             
                             
                              
                             
                             
                              
                             
                             
                              
                             
                             
                              
                             
                             
                              
                             
                             
                              
                             
                             
                              
                              
 On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:43 AM, James Bowery                               
<jabow...@gmail.com> wrote:                               
                               
                                
 Low pulsed frequency is a contradiction in terms.                              
  
                                
                                 
                                  
                                   
                                   
 On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:01 AM, ChemE Stewart                                  
  <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote:                                    
                                    
 Except low pulsed frequencies                                     
                                      
                                                                              
                                       
 On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, James Bowery <                                       
jabow...@gmail.com> wrote:                                       
                                       
                                        
                                         
                                         
                                          
                                          
 On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:42 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint                                
           <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote:                                       
    
                                           
                                            
                                             
                                              
 This is primarily meant for fellow Vort, ChemEng (Stewart), but some others 
may have an interest…                                                           
                                                                                
 
                                              
                                                                                
                                                             
                                              
 Stewart, I think I may have a cause for your hypothesis re: a link between our 
modern radar systems and the dying of coral reefs…                              
                
                                             
                                            
                                           
                                           
                                            
                                             
                                              
 ...                                                                            
                  
                                              
 Time to break out the tin-foil hats???                                         
     
                                             
                                            
                                           
                                           
                                          
                                          
                                         
                                         
 No need.  Salt water shields against EM penetration.                           
              
                                        
                                       
                                      
                                     
                                    
                                   
                                   
                                  
                                 
                                
                               
                              
                              
                             
                            
                           
                          
                         
                        
                        
                       
                      
                     
                    
                   
                  
                 
                
              
              
             
            
           
          
         
        
      
      
     
    
   
 

Reply via email to