Like so much in this universe, it comes down to input, process, and output. The output from lenr can take many forms based on linkages in the process mechanism. These outputs include light, particles fragments, particle creation like muons and electrons, magnetism, RF, shock waves, heat, XUV and x-rays and sometimes gamma.
It takes knowhow to get the energy produced by LENR to come out as heat. But it would be better if the energy came out as electrons. On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:24 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:39:59 +0300: > Hi, > [snip] > > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/leonid-urutskoev-phenomenological-model.html > >A very important paper- I think, and new thinking- essential. > >Peter > > I have been afraid of this for 20 years. :( If this were the only type of > reaction, it could mean LENR would primarily be useful for production of > elements/isotopes that are in low supply, rather than as a source of > energy. > > However it may also be possible to provide starting combinations where no > good > low energy match is possible, forcing the process to release considerable > energy. > > BTW this sort of process appears to crop up whenever the reaction site is > flooded with electrons. > (See also Proton21 in Russia, and even Mills' latest efforts may be an > example.) > > I wonder if one of their (inadvertent?) criteria was that the products be > stable > nuclei? > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
