Jed,
I voted for you.
This is what I wrote my local paper. I didn't mention LENR because they
have published a number of my pieces on the subject already.
Adrian
To the Times.
The Paris climate accord means little beyond others saying they agreed
with President Obama's opinion. The agreement was held up for nearly
two hours while the US pressed for changing "shall" to "should".
Apparently developed countries /should/ commit to reduced emissions and
/should /continue to provide financial support for poor nations to cope
with climate change. Congressional approval is not required for others
to agree to this opinion and there is nothing legally binding to make
them do anything.
As far as one can tell, nations will continue to do just what they were
planning to do without this agreement. At least we will not be locked
in to something unnecessary when new sources of clean energy become
visible, and there are several on the horizon right now.
