Jones,
See my post below yours Direct power from E-Cat X
<http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg106635.html> for a
hint of how electricity might be gathered. Rossi is careful not to
claim too much as it is obviously early days.
I don't know why you are quite so scathing in what you write about
Rossi. As far as I can tell he has advanced the field further than
anyone else. Agaricus put it well on Ecatworld.
"It is still remotely possible not only that Rossi is a fantasist but
that all the other material published on LENR is specious and all those
involved are frauds or delusional. However, as the probability of this
now seems to be at the sub-1% level it makes rather more sense to accept
the data at face value.
If this turns out to be an incorrect assessment, so be it, but from
where I'm standing it seems more likely that it will be the diehard
skeptics such as yourself whose assumed superiority will look pretty
silly in a couple of years or less."
1) 140 patents in progress
2) Direct electricity or heat - either one or both
3) Jet engine application
4) Fully Robotic factory to make fuel wafers
5) Reactor hotter on outside than inside
6) No fuel module replaced in last 300 days
1) Who knows? You don't
2) A hint of how this is possible is given in my post
3) I see little difficulty is using Hot Cats to simply replace the combustion
on a small gas turbine.
4) This is the logical route. The automation machines came from shoe
manufacturing.
5) If the outside is hotter because of EM it, is possible.
6) Unless you have proof that Rossi et Al et Darden are all liars, that is
what he says.
