This is helpful as the context of this experiments radiation measurement seems to be much less than the radiation needed to expose/fog a single dental x-ray film. It’s the digital/digitized equivalent of such. Clearly no danger to humans in the vicinity. Given that a single joule/watt of fusion is ~e12/sec D+D events here we might see evidence of a long time cumulative rate that comes from an impossibly small fraction of a single joule of cold fusion. The devil once again seems to be revealed in the details.
From: Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 9:03 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Implied personal radiation dose ? I looked at the math again. The 5 uS was for the full 4pi steradians. It would be more like 0.4 uS for 1 steradian. A person would have to be really chubby or really close to subtend 1 steradian. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com <mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> > wrote: >From the signal pulse, I estimate about 5 micro-Sieverts (uS) per steradian. >So, it depends on how close you were. On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com <mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> > wrote: If the radiation signal in the recent MFMP experiment holds up what does this infer as a dose for the person doing the experiment? Clearly that person is both a much larger ‘detector’, likely often closer to the source, and has a long exposure from this and many similar experiments. It would seem likely the ‘human detector dose’ is some orders of magnitude more than what the detector has recorded.
