Jones, isn't there a distinction between [UDH and UDD] and the [IRH and DDL]? As I understood it [IRH and DDL] are references to sub-ground states for an individual hydrogen atom. OTOH, [UDH and UDD] are condensed matter states of multiple atoms. Did I get this wrong?
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > From: Robert Dorr > > Nicely done presentation. Well worth giving a look. > > > These are the same slides used by Ólafsson at the colloquium back in > October > at SRI, reported here: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105372.html > > Here is the easy link to the slides > https://goo.gl/Zlenbp > > However, even today – the majority of observers in LENR seems to gloss over > the main point – which is that although fusion can happen, the bulk of the > energy release is in the form of muons (aka meson chain) and is generally > lost to the reactor itself (since most of the energy ends up as neutrinos). > Even so, there is net gain. The implication is that if properly engineered, > the gain will be much higher. > > In short, “something is accidentally created,” which causes seemingly > impossible nuclear reactions (nucleon disintegration) and that something is > UDH or UDD – ultra dense hydrogen. George Miley used to call it IRH or > inverted Rydberg hydrogen. Now it is simply call UDH or DDL (deep Dirac > level). > > Ultra-dense hydrogen can be the source of all or part of Cold fusion LENR > related phenomena. Laser induced fusion in UDH is the most effective way to > see the results since it produces muons as the longest-lived species. This > is also known as the “meson chain reaction” and the lifetime is several > microseconds, so that most of the energy will be deposited as neutrinos > many > meters away from the reactor – up to hundreds of meters. > > >
