After having read Dufour's paper, it appears that it is complete hypothesis
on the basis of the fact that the other forces seem to converge in
magnitude at a sub-nuclear scale - so why shouldn't gravitation?  He
presents no apparent data that his hypothesis has any basis.  Gravitation
would have to change radically from the 100 micron scale to the 1 fermi
scale.  While possible, it would be nice to have some real evidence.  It
would seem like it would create a measurable change in the lines of
hydrogen as predicted by the Dirac equation because this nonlinear gravity
is not accounted in the Dirac equation (we know that the Schrodinger values
are off for lack of inclusion of special relativity).

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

> One other thought about Dufour’s hypothesis of a VERY SIZEABLE INCREASE
> OF GRAVITATION AT PICOMETER DISTANCE (on the order of Coulomb repulsion).
> This provides the effective pressure, on the order of hundreds of
> gigapascals, which is required for the known version of metallic
> hydrogen. The denser version is merely a further step and not unexpected
> if gravity operates this way.
>
>
> *http://www.iscmns.org/asti06/J-DUFOUR%20-%20ASTI%20PRESENTATION%20-%202006.pdf*
> <http://www.iscmns.org/asti06/J-DUFOUR%20-%20ASTI%20PRESENTATION%20-%202006.pdf>
>
> Ten years ago, Durour is talking about a model with several binding
> energies for hydrogen in the range of several hundred eV and actually
> mentions the value of 650 eV which Holmlid settles on. No one paid much
> attention then.
>
> But Dufour goes further to imply that LENR does not need nuclear reactions
> if “picochemistry” involves any kind of asymmetry since the chemical energy
> level is so great. That would open a Pandora’s box which apparently he
> wishes to avoid, so the details of how picochemistry would ultimately be
> powered (ZPE ?) are missing. In so doing, he left open the door for
> Holmlid to get most of the credit… but LH deserves it. He has taken a
> huge risk, published tirelessly - and could come out of it with a big
> prize.
>
>

Reply via email to