If I understand right, this idea from Lawandy seems compatible with some recent posts by Ecco on Quantum Heat so I think you may have something there. It will be interesting to see where it goes.
> On 23 May 2016, at 19:13, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > The answer to these questions varies wildly, according to the theorist. There > is little proof that can be called firm. The theory that appeals to me the > most is not Holmlid’s but the one of Lawandy. In that theory, there must be a > dielectric support for UDH, which is always paired. A larger cluster of pairs > is possible with no electrons – instead the charge is balanced by deflated > electrons captured in the dielectric. The paper is on the LENR-CANR site. > There is no “Rydberg matter” per se, but this dense state can be labeled as > IRH or inverted Rydberg hydrogen. > > From: Stephen Cooke > > Oops i meant H(0) of course > > Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen: > > Is it possible for H(1) to exist as only one pair of atoms in dense form or > is a layer of additional pairs in a vortex is required to stabilise it? > > Does anyone know if H(1) matter would contain stable electron orbitals, or > would the electrons be freely moving in a conduction band? > > If it is possible to have a single pair and it has electron orbitals would > they look familiar? i.e. I suppose they would be external to the pair of > protons, would they there for look like orbitals from Helium atom with some > offset due to the different reduced mass due to lack of neutrons, and > different spin state of the nucleus? Or would they be more complex due to > dynamics of the proton pair? > > Is there a reason the protons in the pair do not repel each other? is it > sufficient that the 2 elections stabilise them somehow or does it require > interactions with other pairs in the vortex to remain stable? > >
