yes, dear Harry- in principle. But the Dismiss document is Information too These accusations also. Why has IH accepted unsuitable instruments?
Only the answer to this is genuine information? I do not get the logic of this... peter On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:12 PM, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter, this is how private R&D works. Neither Leonardo Corp. nor IH owe > the public any information. > > Harry > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> *dear Jed,* >> *i have just been writing my answer to this assertion:* >> >> *Announced a year ago this could be an argument but even then how could >> Rossi depart from the test plan; how many reactors were "inoperable" and in >> which sense? Flawed measurements have to be reported immediately and what >> unsuitable measuring instruments were used- for a long year for >> temperature, pressure, flow- seismometers, dynamometers, microscopes?* >> >> *Now post-factum after 4 reports of the ERV, after alternative >> measurements by IH employees. such arguments are dead.* >> >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: >>> >>>> IH has apparently sent Krivit a copy of their legal response to the >>>> court case. >>>> >>> I expect he found it by some other means. >>> >>> From a quick scan it doesn’t look like they have stated the E-Cat >>>> doesn’t work . . . >>>> >>> >>> It says this on p. 2, in the footnote: >>> >>> "Guaranteed Performance Test" that the Complaint purposely ignores (such >>> as departing from the purported test plan, ignoring inoperable reactors, >>> relying on flawed measurements, and using unsuitable measuring devices). >>> >>> - Jed >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
