a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: The only thing Rossi stopped the IH employee from doing was visit the > customer's plant. >
Who told you that? That is not what I have heard. Stopping the visit would be bad enough, in any case. > Show me the actual quotation where IH said it was unacceptable AT THE > BEGINNING. > I have no idea what happened at THE BEGINNING. They said it was unacceptable several months later. Why does it matter? Is there a statute of limitations? Do you have have to find problems at THE BEGINNING or never? That makes no sense. > You may know what the instrumentation was but you have not shared that > info and I don't know what it was. > So you will have to wait. So stop jumping to conclusions. Stop taking sides. Stop making up stuff, such as: "The only thing Rossi stopped the IH employee from doing was visit the customer's plant." If you know it, why not list it? > Obviously because I agreed not to. Duh. If you want information, you should ask Rossi for the ERV report. - Jed
