Well that sucks. I can totally imagine the ending, tho -- the one thing
Abd was really, really poor at was shutting up.
In any case, if a troll (Christian or not, sounds like that's what it
was) provoked someone so badly that both the troll and the target were
banned, that /certainly/ doesn't justify keeping /another/ troll on the
rolls so they can try the same trick, this time in the political arena.
Anyhow that's my feeling about it, but I've gotten a lot less patient
with such stuff over the years.
In any case this sub-discussion is totally unrelated to energy, free,
possible, plausible, or otherwise, and so I will say nothing more about it.
On 06/25/2016 03:49 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
It's about keeping standards... not justifying 2 wrongs.
Abd was banned, I think, 3 years ago, when a Christian creationist was
attacking Abd for being Muslim and Abd was defending his religion
relentlessly, but providing historical facts and explaining things in
context. The attack lasted for 2 or 3 weeks with a few hundreds of
messages from both sides. In the end, both were banned. The attacker
came back eventually, I don't remember what happened to him after, though.
2016-06-25 15:47 GMT-03:00 Stephen A. Lawrence <sa...@pobox.com
<mailto:sa...@pobox.com>>:
And .... */Abd was banned??/* When was that? And why?
