my perspective on this sort of thing-- >>>>That was 2004. Over the next 11 years, the question of who killed Mallove >>>>would lead Curtis down a path he never expected. Mallove, the detective >>>>discovered, was one of the world’s most outspoken advocates for cold >>>>fusion. “It’s science well above my intellect,” Curtis says. Yet cold >>>>fusion isn’t just a complicated form of nuclear energy. It’s also highly >>>>controversial. Supporters see it as energy’s holy grail, the key to saving >>>>the Earth from environmental destruction. Critics maintain it might not >>>>even be possible—and that any claims that it’s already been achieved are >>>>total fringe-science lunacy.
"they" don't even teach unified field theory to physics students ; so these supposed "critics" can't even properly assess claims from people like Mallove. The Father of Modern Atomic Physics was Boscovich--- but that is not even taught to physics students. Bohr, Heisenberg, Einstein etc when it came to what they were working from ; it was Boscovich theory. But at university "they" miss that out; it is sort of a teach Newton, Maxwell and a few other things then jump pass 18th century atomic physics (Boscovich) and start teaching 20 th century stuff of relativity and quantum physics. Boscovich from Croatia/Serbia i.e. from same area of world as Tesla. They have a Physics institute named after Boscovich. Last year I gave a talk there about Boscovich; and top lady scientist from Boscovich Institute didn't know anything about Boscovich; that is how famous Boscovich is!!! You want to talk about cold fusion, then you need to talk about the original atomic theory upon what modern physics is based; but there are very few people who know what that "is". I am one of the few people does know. Latest talk this year is about how "point-particles" has been misundertoood at Vigier Conference. http://www.noeticadvancedstudies.us/AndertonX.pdf On Monday, 18 July 2016, 6:53, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: this was published in EGO OUT on July 8 but ignored 3) A great paper about Gene Mallove The Coldest Case Eugene Mallove gave up everything to pursue the holy grail of nuclear energy. Did it cost him his life? by David Kushner http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/07/the-coldest-case-cold-fusion-eugene-mallove-mit-infinite-energy/ peter On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 5:00 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: A feature article in foreign policy.com (!) http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/07/the-coldest-case-cold-fusion-eugene-mallove-mit-infinite-energy/ The author of the article is a professor of journalism at Princeton. Eric -- Dr. Peter GluckCluj, Romaniahttp://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
