I agree Alain. There are some elegant aspects to McCulloch's theory that warrant investigation. He needs a good experimentalist to test some of his claims.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:13 AM Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> wrote: > people interested in Grand Unification maye be interested by this approach > of MiHsC that link basic newtonian graviation with Heisenberg Uncertainty > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ge_ukRbuOw > > MiHsC need to be studied, to be improved or refuted, as it is one of the > few coherent way to make really QM and gravitation converge. > > Michael McCulloch claims it explains roughly without tuning the recently > found anomalies in dwarf galaxies, EmDrive (even some negative=tiny > results). His claims have to be confirmed sincerely (the hardes is to find > someone skeptical but not in love with debunking methods), and then > improved with good math. > > my feeling is that if Einstein GR geometry is in competition with MiHsC > (which is based on SR and QM), the symmetry founding GR is respected by GU > theories, as is Heisenberg Uncertainty. > > My naive feeling is that Michael McCulloch need some help from someone > knowing well GR geometry, QM, and sincerely interested in improving MiHsC > (Like was the mathematicien of Einstein). > > On point on which I wonder is if MiHsC can explain black hole observation, > gravitational waves, gravitational lenses. > > 2016-08-18 14:06 GMT+02:00 Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com>: > >> This new equation might finally unite the two biggest theories in >> physics, physicist claims >> >> http://flip.it/nxwTOa >> > >
