Maybe we are seeing the beginning of the explanation of many of the so called constants found in physical theories. For example, might not an electron’s charge be explained as a tightly curled magnetic field disturbance with small dimensions in the realm of the Planck scale?
Constants in theories only reflect limited understanding of the natural laws IMHO. To get at the truth, we need to eliminate constants from our logic and resulting truths. (Constants are ok for engineers that try to develop some practical device.) Bob Cook From: bobcook39...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 8:53 AM To: H Ucar; vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Tresino, EZBW, Barut, h and bound state of spinning magnets The 1-D nature of strong magnetic fields IMHO is what increases the odds of resonant coupling among particles with a magnetic moment. I can imagine that this coupling would also work to couple with the magnetic dipole entities making up nuclei, whether these entities are quarks per the standard theory or positrons and electrons per the Phillipe Hatt’s theory.or William Stubbs’ theory, both of which explain the presence of muons, and electrons and positrons being constituents of protons and neutrons. As might be expected these theories find no traction in the established physics community, which is looking face down, fat, dumb and happy, bowing to their emperor with many holes in his suit. H Ucar’s fresh idea about Plank’s constant being not really a constant is very intriguing. Bob Cook Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: H Ucar Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 6:27 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Tresino, EZBW, Barut, h and bound state of spinning magnets You may be aware of tresino model of F. J. Mayer which have similar energy figures of hydrino. This model depends purely to electrostatic and magnetostatic equilibrium, workable on 1D but likely unstable under more degrees of freedom that Earnshaw theorem do not permit such a equilibrium but here is still a possibility due to angular momentum of electrons (or spin) may provide the angular stabilization like Levitron but unlikely to tolerate disturbances. The article does not evaluate such criteria and only give equilibrium in one axis. On the other hand, bound state based purely on magnetic interaction on fermi distances inside nucleons (where Coulomb forces can be safely ignored in presence of very large magnetic interaction) or on combined attractive Coulomb forces and repulsive magnetic interaction in presence of proposable rotating or oscillation magnetic field provided by involved particles (see my exeriments at www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3KwdWTgl7fisd3h_tK1YLhFeuzkPATNt). The latter can be formed in Compton wavelenth scale similar to tresino. There is also a general model based on angular oscillation of electron spin called Extended Zitterbewegung (EZBW) proposed by A. Niehous which open a possibility to explain quantum behavior of particles by classical mean. Indeed quantum mechanics definition of spin (as z and x,y components) allows stochastic interpretations. All is remaining is experimental evidence. If provided, Barut's hypothesizes on unification of nuclear forces on electromagnetism and building all particles from electron, proton and neutrino would be realized.This open also the way to explain full quantum phenomena classically. A newly submited paper on arxiv.org "Derivation of Schrödinger’s equation (https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.01880) formulates the Planck's constant with this comment: >From (58) it follows that the Planck constant is not a fundamental physical >constant, but rather a random variable which may be expressed in terms of more >basic parameters of a stationary stochastic process. It would be nice that appearance of h in all formulas of physics would make sense according this. A note about bound states I obtained is they are highly stable under disturbing effects most of time but some 'bad' resonances can kill them.
