On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote:

>
> Rossi kindled interest in a similar fashion to Bernie Madoff!
>


That's about the most sense I've read here today.





>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 2, 2017 4:38 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:33 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> See http://www.e-catworld.com/why-i-believe-in-the-e-cat/
>> Like it or not,  Rossi rekindled interest in LENR like no other has.
>>
>
>
> Where's the BEEF??
> Where's the damned water-heater the World was promised..?
> (Where's the 'Orbo' Revolution, for that matter...)
>
> Damned 'private-property' interests.
> Capitalist 'efficiency' (Over-Unity, at that) at its best...
> Pfft.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> AA
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/2/2017 12:12 PM, Che wrote:
>>
>>
>> Have I missed something? Why is Rossi still being taken seriously here on
>> vortex-L?
>>
>> At the very least, his proprietary secrecy has cost Science a great deal.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 3:31 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It has been evident for years that Rossi has been spending time boning
>>> up on atomic physics.
>>>
>>> What he writes here makes sense to me, but perhaps others here, more
>>> expert than me, will comment.
>>>
>>>
>>>    1. Andrea Rossi
>>>    March 31, 2017 at 12:55 PM
>>>    
>>> <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=223#comment-1273347>
>>>
>>>    Eugene Atthove:
>>>    As a matter of fact, neutrinos and antineutrinos in the nuclear
>>>    physics equations are “tricks”, assumed to be real to obtain the respect 
>>> of
>>>    the leptons conservation law.
>>>    For example: the neutron decay, of which we talked yesterday, gives
>>>    one proton, one electron and one antineutrino: why? Because at the left 
>>> of
>>>    the neutron decay equation you do not have leptons, at the right you have
>>>    one lepton and this would be against the leptons number conservation law:
>>>    therefore you have to assume the emission of an antineutrino, so you have
>>>    one plus lepton ( the electron ), one minus lepton ( the antineutrino ) =
>>>    zero leptons also at the right of the equation, so that the law is
>>>    respected. You could say that this sounds a little bit tricky, like an
>>>    artifact, but…it is, albeit without this trick the Standard Model would
>>>    brutally crack down: realistically, between a crack and a trick is better
>>>    the trick.
>>>    Warm Regards,
>>>    A.R.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to