Brian—

You sound a bit cynical.

It may be nothing more than fake news.

Bob Cook

From: Brian Ahern<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 9:55 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nature reporting overunity?


This is a shameful announcement. It makes the populace think there is a 
wonderful new energy technology.



This is funding season and this is a tawdry example of scientific pandering.


From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 10:36 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nature reporting overunity?


Robin

Wiki agrees that "quantum efficiency" is the ratio of the number of charge 
carriers (in the case of water that would be protons) which are collected by 
the solar cell, compared to the number of photons of a given energy incident on 
the solar cell. This is essentially what you said and it means that the useful 
efficiency of solar water splitting, in terms of hydrogen output per unit of 
area, is limited to UV irradiance, which is a fraction of normal sunlight.

The bond enthalpy of OH-H is 268 kJ/mol or 2.78 eV which is essentially in the 
UV range for photons. Most UV is captured by the atmosphere but enough gets 
through to make it interesting. The band gap of silicon for photovoltaic is 
only 1 eV but the coupling losses are huge so the comparative efficiency is 
below 20%. Thus splitting water via sunlight would be viable, especially for 
automotive uses once the problem of storage is solved.  Moreover, the "waste" 
visible sunlight not robust enough to split water can still produce electricity 
so a combined facility would be advantageous.

To put this new report about overunity water splitting into perspective - it 
should mean that making hydrogen as well as making electricity are 
complementary processes - and once the storage problem is solved, hydrogen 
could be the favored output. Fortunately, there is a German company which seems 
to have solved the hydrogen storage problem in a unique way - as a solute not 
requiring pressurization.

http://www.hydrogenious.net/en/energy-storage/
Energy Storage - Hydrogenious 
Technologies<http://www.hydrogenious.net/en/energy-storage/>
www.hydrogenious.net
Hydrogenious Technologies developed the breakthrough in hydrogen storage. The 
safe and efficient storage of hydrogen in Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers 
(LOHC).



This has "automotive" applications written all over it. Will the new Tesla be a 
German startup which is quickly snatched up by VW or Mercedes?
mix...@bigpond.com<mailto:mix...@bigpond.com> wrote:

In reply to  Jones Beene's message of Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:32:42 -0700:

Hi,

[snip]

A double miracle.... since ostensible OU was reported by Nature, the

anti-miracle(anti-LENR) mag...



There may or may not be an LENR connection here.



https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170425124226.htm



An overunity giant step toward producing hydrogen fuel? Essentially,

they created what is known as a quantum dot photoelectrochemical cell

that catalytically achieved quantum efficiency for hydrogen gas

production exceeding 100% --  approaching 114% ...



...but hey - we can be happy, even elated with 99% since solar to

electric only gives about 18%. However, you may want to contemplate how

quantum efficiency differs from the normal variety...

I think quantum yield is just the number of electrons per photon. In which case

it's not surprising that they exceed 100%, since some high energy photons are

capable of creating multiple free electrons. This may happen when a high energy

photon is absorbed, ionizing an atom and leaving the electron with enough excess

kinetic energy to ionize another atom. Hence two free electrons iso one.



Last year (I think) I tried pointing out to Mills that his optical spectrum was

ideal for taking advantage of this principle, but it seems to have fallen on

deaf ears.



(Most of the energy he produces is in the UV to soft x-ray band.)



Regards,



Robin van Spaandonk



http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html









Reply via email to