On Sun, 21 May 2017 18:06:23 -0700 "Kevin O'Malley" <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/conceptual-penis-social-contruct-sokal-style-hoax-on-gender-studies/#0 http://crookedtimber.org/2017/05/22/prickly-questions/ has a different take on the "hoax". They got an auto-reply from very-low-rated NORMA: The International Journal for Masculinity Studies -- refering them to co-owned pay-to-play vanity site nobody's ever heard of. In general, I'd say the peer-review process isn't (in general) discredited by this hoax. -- Alan Fletcher <a...@well.com>
