>>We would ideally not attract pugnacious participants
Galileo was pugnacious
On Monday, 3 July 2017, 16:11, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Kevin,
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:
You have a perception of someone who claims to be a lawyer who has missed at
least 2 major aspects of the law with respect to this case. You have a
one-sided perception. HE WAS THE ONE WHO STARTED THE INSULTS. But you put ME
on probation. That says volumes about your moderating ability.
In your pugnacious attacks, you will drive away informed participants such as
woodworker. woodworker's slights were subtle. Your retorts were crass and
sought to escalate the matter. Hopefully the distinction is apparent to you.
Informed participants with relevant experience are the people we seek to
attract. We would ideally not attract pugnacious participants such as
yourself, but there's only so much we can do.
You say I was given a request on a side thread, and then a warning AFTER I WAS
PUT ON PROBATION. Your approach is completely screwed up.
Yes, point conceded. Better recollecting what I had in mind when I said you
were on "probation" (not something that has not been formalized at LENR Forum),
you were basically put in the category of participants such as Sifferkoll the
minute I saw that you were on the attack. I've seen you in action on Vortex,
so your reputation proceeded you.
I'm going to disengage in this discussion with you about moderation at LENR
Forum at this point and allow you the last word.
Eric
