If a quantum bomb could store energy in an entangled state, it would explode by de-entanglement rather than by a chain reaction.
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can not see how the Bose Condensation nature of ultra dense material can > support a chain reaction. The Condensate offloads its excess energy through > the production of muons not neutrons. Muons are not bad like neutrons. > Muons do not pump the Condensate, so there is no positive feedback loop > possible > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> >> >> https://aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.5009233 >> >> >> >> Physicist Peter Zimmerman is a long time skeptic of LENR, but he is >> extremely knowledgeable about the risk of nuclear proliferation in the age >> of well-financed terrorism. >> >> >> >> Even before P&F made the cover of Time, PZ had consulted on a novel by >> Nicolas Freeling, who is a second tier English author of detective >> stories. The book is named “Gadget” and true to form, it bombed (so to >> speak) … reaching an audience of a few thousand, but it is available online >> as a used book. Worth the read. >> >> >> >> The underlying appreciation of the risk of nuclear proliferation makes >> this novel way ahead of its time, and it accepts the extreme lengths that >> zealots will employ to reach their goal: the “suicide vest” mentality, >> shall we say. The title borrows the Los Alamos wartime slang for the >> ‘big one’ and conjures up that unforgettable mental image of Major Kong >> waving his cowboy hat on his way to another world… from Dr. Strangelove. >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snTaSJk0n_Y >> >> >> >> Yikes. The detail which has changed the risk assessment in the last >> several years is the revelations about UDD – ultradense deuterium. If there >> is any reality to the species, then oops… UDD multiplies the chance of >> major catastrophe from nuclear terrorism enormously… since it negates the >> need for high enrichment and possibly even the need for fissile material at >> all. >> >> >> >> Anyway, Zimmerman- while surely he would be ostensibly denying that UDD >> is real, is probably paying close attention to progress in Sweden and may >> be operating to classify some of the results before it is too late. >> >> >> >> He has calculated the time and skill which would be needed to produce an >> “IND” or improvised nuclear device using the old fashioned way, and it is >> not that expensive to begin with. In a way, it is a miracle that it has not >> been done in a crude form. The IND is a step up from the dirty bomb, which >> is the crude form, but either one could render Manhattan uninhabitable for >> a few generations… which may be preferable to triggering WWIII but should >> never be ignored as a major threat. >> >> >> >> Since the amount of money needed for an IND is not large -ISIS makes more >> in a day or two selling drugs, which is its real business these days - then >> terrorists would ignore the high tech option and possibly opt out for a >> dirty bomg, but still… UDD may represent a paradigm shift in more arenas >> than cheap energy. >> >> >> >> Be careful what you wish for… >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
