Jones— Where did the model of “antiquarks” come from; Is that your conjecture?
The antiquark thesis would seem to suggest that the Standard Model may be getting somemore primary particles to add to its stable. A sterile antineutron may not be too sterile around regular neutrons. The idea of mirror matter is a new one for me. Must be the result of fake science. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ________________________________ From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2018 7:34:17 AM To: Vortex-l Subject: [Vo]:Dark Matter as a "sterile antineutron" and the LENR connection A good case (but preliminary)is being made in several physics Labs around the World, involving the characterization of a dark matter particle which is both common and related to the neutron, but sterile and slightly lower in mass. In fact, it appears that about 1% of any neutron beam from any neutron generator(planned or unplanned) will consist of this particle, which seems to oscillate back and forth (as with neutrino oscillation). It has been called an X-particle, but it could actually be antimatter, or the equally exotic "mirror matter". As an uncharged particle it does not normally annihilate with matter but when it does, only muons are seen - never gamma photons. It is more like a mirror image neutron than what we expect of antimatter, but it seems to consist of antiquarks. Of course, in the vastness of our Universe, there could be more than one kind of dark matter, perhaps many varieties, and this may be only a small percentage of all dark matter. It is surprising that the new particle seems to be basically an antineutron. It is also possible that this particle is the same one which appears as many of the forms of "dense hydrogen," such as UDH and also the ultra low momentum neutron. In other words, we could finally be getting close to identifying a unique dark matter particle which has been notably responsible for some of the past anomalies lumped together as "cold fusion". At least this is one broad interpretation of the research: https://physicsworld.com/a/neutron-anomaly-might-point-to-dark-matter/ [1801.01124] Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly<https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.01124> This "second type of neutron" whether it is ultra low momentum or not, would be largely indistinguishable from LENR dense hydrogen but with a variation in lifetime. It would not be the exact UDH of Holmlid, but there are many theories which are similar and it seems like a more accurate picture will emerge soon involving electron orbital "shrinkage" which converts protons into a light sterile neutron composed of antiquarks. <https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.01124> [1801.01124] Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly
