High local B magnetic fields are important in establishing energy states of coherent systems they penetrate.
We note the Mosier-Boss conclusion that SC and LENR seem to be related phenomena. The Meissner effect,t as it has been long recognized, expels magnetic fields from within a super conductor to the exterior surface. Near by isotopes with various spin energy states would be affected with pertinent new resonances associated with the modified energy states. In addition, if the super conducting item were s a particular alignment of atoms in a nano-size defect of the host material. allowable positions of positive charged particles trapped within an intra-cell lattice vacancy significantly reduced. making coupling between the positive particles more likely. The respective spin energy states of the entire coupled system—lattice electrons and nucleons—changes per the 2nd Law to reduce potential energy and increase kinetic energy, conserving angular momentum. Many particles may be involved in t he change of the coherent system with transmutations and fusion of involved particles making up the coherent system, changing their original particle identity. Reactions can continue as long as the SC phenomena remains with its enhancing B field. This mechanism may explain the localization of LENR/SC observed in the Mosier-Boss etal. Research. Engineering of nano defects and SC materials is where the rubber meets the road IMHO. Also being able to control the processes with varying magnetic fields using electromagnets, permanent magnets or coherent EM photonic stimulation is an obvious advantage in achieving a practical device. Limiting lattice temperatures is a must objective to assure the reactor does not self destruct due to melting. Collecting gross positive and negative charges released during the LENR reactions for direct electrical energy production would be valuable as well. Hopefully the production of reactions that produce neutrons that can activate reactor materials can be avoided to eliminate radioactive waste problems. Understanding the detailed reactions possible is essential to avoid the undesirable neutrons. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ________________________________ From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, July 7, 2019 9:49:17 AM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Meissner effect and focusing ? We can produce ultra-dense matter using just about any initial feedstock if we apply enough pressure to it. In the case of the “woodpecker” experiment being reported by Can, the material that he are working with is water. The pressure application is coming from the calling cavitation bubble produced by an electric arc. Water could reach a metallic state just like hydrogen given the application of enough pressure. On Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 12:43 PM JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote: Thanks, Jürg. A “focusing” capability – using neodymium ring magnets - would present an interesting option in a situation where the superconductor is the not the pellet we are familiar with, but instead is a microscopic strings of dense hydrogen, such as described by Holmlid. If that dense species can be enriched and collected in a focal point of two ring magnets – while the species is still in a liquid or slurry, then there would be a potential answer as to how it could form a target for a laser pulse. Normally we would imagine that far too little of it would be available as a target - due to dilution within the liquid. What brought this up now is the simple “woodpecker” experiment being reported by Can on lenr-forum. By careful data collection he has turned a simple and cheap experiment into something potentially meaningful. There is a chance that he is making dense hydrogen in the slurry with the spark discharge. Of course the small increase in counts is only suggestive of a Holmlid or Mills effect , but would be of greater potential importance if laser imploded, since that should entail an exponential increase in counts (according to Holmlid). That outcome of greatly increased counts could be stretch given this situation – but the idea that Holmlid’s concept of a superfluid/superconductive species which can be made simply by sparking – that is provocative - and even more so if there is a pathway to actually activating the dilute species with a laser pulse. From: Jürg Wyttenbach<mailto:ju...@datamart.ch> >From the physics point of view the Meissner effect is caused by an induced - >repelling - counter current. If such a current stays on a ring then from the physics point of view the rings will self adjust as long as the axis of the opposite field stays inside the ring. (Of course there are more parameters like real mass etc. for an exact model) I used this in my old LENR writeup to explain how magnetic focusing of Li*-H* works... Am 07.07.19 um 17:27 schrieb JonesBeene: Here is an interesting question with a non-obvious application to LENR – involving the Meissner effect and magnetic focusing. It's unclear from the literature whether the Meissner Effect can be used to focus an object in a static magnetic field. For instance, imagine two strong magnets facing each other in repelling (bucking) mode with a gap in between them.. Will a superconductor (HTSC) become focused, locked and constrained within the cusp of the magnets’ bucking field (which is expected) OR does flux pinning actually hinder this focusing? The answer to that question – if it is out there on the Web, does not turn up easily. As soon as the answer turns up, an interesting way in which this could dynamic have usefulness in LENR will be mentioned. -- Jürg Wyttenbach Bifangstr.22 8910 Affoltern a.A. 044 760 14 18 079 246 36 06
