In my view, there are two independent processes at play in the LENR reaction such as happens in the Mizumo mesh: transmutation and vacuum energy extraction. This leads to confusion about what nuclear reactions are producing energy because we don't see any energy produced by transmutation but we do see energy produced by vacuum energy extraction. False equivalences are naturally drawn which are invalid. The energy produced by fusion is not visible to us but the energy produced by vacuum energy extraction is visible. Relating this vacuum energy to the fusion reaction is misleading and invalid.
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 7:49 PM H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If mass energy conversion is treated as a cause of nuclear structure then > you are correct. I am looking at it as an effect of nuclear structure so > the energy produced per atom would only tell us that nuclear forces are > involved. > Harry > > On Tue., Jul. 16, 2019, 6:23 p.m. , <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > >> In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:44:27 -0400: >> Hi, >> [snip] >> >IMO the focus on mass-energy equivalence at the present time is not >> helpful >> >in this field. It should be set aside until there is a rough explanation >> of >> >the nuclear dynamics without it. Harry >> [snip] >> Calculation of the energy yield / atom would actually tell us a lot, >> because >> there is a considerable difference in yield between the various theories. >> I.e. >> >> Electron shrinkage (e.g. Mills): ev-keV >> Fusion: MeV >> Complete conversion of matter to energy: GeV >> >> There is roughly a factor of 1000 between each theory, so the energy / >> atom >> could be a good indicator. Even if the measured value lies somewhere in >> between, >> it would likely be an indication that the energy is coming from a >> combination of >> the above, and even indicate which combination is most likely. >> >> >>
