http://www.jmcchina.org/html/2019/1/20190101.htm
Replication of biologic transmutation using a chemical reaction. The productivity of the transmutation was a function of the ambient temperature of the solution. 75C produced the most transmutation. Note that there was no report of a heating effect or other energy release that accompanied the transmutation. On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 11:14 AM JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > *“The *energy release per atom would be useful, to narrow down the > possibilities.” > > > > Yes. No doubt this detail would be very useful to know, but is it even > possible to know? > > Probably NOT as of now – since it makes a fundamental assumption which is > not proved. > > That fundamental assumption is that energy release happens only once per > atom – as in fusion. At first this seems to be a logical assumption, but > fusion is not yet proved. If atoms produce lesser energy sequentially > (still giving up mass) then the energy per atom would not be relevant > since any atom could radiate excess energy several times or several million > times during the run. > > At this point we do no need to be specific about the details of the > alternative mechanism to show the logical error, but there are several > recognized possibilities that actually make as much sense as fusion > including a version of the Hotson theory. > > One particular operative mechanism which could change perceptions is > related to the experimental findings which have been provided by Hora, > Miley, Winterberg and Holmlid, et al. going back many years, which involve > Bose-Einstein clustering. There is no apparent limitation on how many times > an individual atom can give up mass-energy in the Coulomb explosion if and > when they occur sequentially. > > To complicated matters – these experts suggest that the BEC cluster can > act as an extremely efficient fusion target to be imploded with a laser. In > that case the energy release per atom in the cluster would be less than the > fusion of two deuterons – on average but the helium is thereafter > unreactive so energy per atom would be useful to know. > > There are other alternative mechanisms for gain not involving fusion. > These researchers also suggest or imply that clustering “alone” can > produce significant excess energy with no fusion and/or a delayed nucleon > annihilation event. Here, we find the sequential Coulomb explosion where > atoms can participate many times. > > Moreover, the Coulomb explosion is presently a proved mechanism with a > signature emission which has been documented via experiment. In contrast > there is no documented fusion evidence from the Mizuno breakthrough - as of > now. It is a mistake to assume that this proof is just around the corner. > It may not happen. I predict it will not. > > If one is firmly convinced that deuterium fusion must be happening in the > new Mizuno breakthrough due to the robustness of the output or their own > per theory or patent - be prepared to jump- ship since there is NO report > of helium which is an absolute requirement to prove that particular > mechanism . > > Until that time that substantial helium-4 is detected – the only gainful > outcomes we know of now from the published record are non-fusion and one > of them relates to the ~630 eV emission from Coulomb explosions. This gain > is probably nuclear related but also probably not related to nuclear > fusion, unless fusion is time-shifted in the QM sense so as to replace a > deficit. > > Jones > > > >
