What does Grimer think? I believe he's on that list. Cheers!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 6:26 AM Vibrator ! <mrvibrat...@gmail.com> wrote: > ..rather than trying to re-summarise the whole thing here, anyone > interested should review my current thread on the BWF; currently looking > at 471 Joules in, for 854 Joules out, with an uncertainty of +/- 0.4 > Joules, from this interaction: > > https://i.ibb.co/BPVMtbV/Fully-Active-low-res.gif > (that's just a low-quality animation of the measured examples) > > > It's basically sinking counter-momenta to gravity and accumulating the > resulting momentum rise at constant energy cost (evolving linearly WRT > velocity) for a squaring KE value. > > The energy gain is substantially greater than the GPE cost of rendering > the effective N3 break. > > Current efficiency appears to be 181%, across the board - ie. you can put > in as much as you want by raising the 'target relative speed'.. > > > As ever, caveat emptor - just cos i ain't found the FUBAR yet don't mean > it ain't there.. > > The thread's a meandering night-by-night research log, hypotheses all over > the place, and so might be more informatively read backwards as forwards > (you know how these things go): > > https://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=172273#172273 > > Don't wanna waste anyone's time on the one hand, but wanna keep you guys > in the loop if it's real.. i honestly don't know what more i could do with > it if it is.. > > (i know it's a chore but would appreciate if the thread were checked first > to see if specific questions are already answered, tho happy to oblige > either way) > > >
