The fantasy of the old SM guard always seemed to be limitless...
SO(4) physics exactly explains how the claimed force "gravity" is
generated and mediated between hadronic masses.
Since about 1 year there is game over for SM. No more cheating with
point particles that do not behave as points because these points have a
magnetic moment. No more cheating with massless charge as such an
assumption simply is a form of infantile dementia if no proof is given
why a massless charge does move without inertia and no force is need for
a circular orbit. Most idiotic is the assumption charge is wave as the
magnetic moment then would oscillate. We can go on with this as you only
need college level understanding to find out that the foundation of SM
is children logic.
J.W.
On 26.06.2020 20:20, bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote:
https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-cartoon-picture-of-magnets-that-has-transformed-science-20200624/
some INTERESTING OBSERVATIONS….
Loss of the directional control of angular momentum in nuclei is
probably is associated with the creation of unstable nuclear
conditions and isotopic transitions. It may also change gravity
Of a group of nuclear magnetic dipoles, if the TOTAO magnetic dipole
attraction is modified—either increases or reduced? *This question
stems from the CONJECTURE that gravity results from an *_random_*
collection of nuclear magnetic dipoles and the respective 0 (zero)
net angular momentum.
The calculation of an attractive magnetic field at large distances
between randomly oriented groups of magnetic dipoles supports the
CONJECTURE noted above IMHO.
_http://downloads.hindawi.com/archive/1998/079537.pdf_
__
A better reference would be nice.
.
Bob Cook
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
