In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 23 Mar 2023 10:59:18 -0400: Hi Jed,
When they stuff something up, you might consider asking for the reference they used to provide the wrong answer. That gives humans a chance to fix the original, which will in turn result in better future responses. >H L V <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> However, the second part of the statement is not accurate. Oxygen-18 is a >>> heavier isotope of oxygen with two more neutrons and two more protons in >>> its nucleus, not one more neutron and one more proton. >>> >> >> If it had two more protons it would be neon. >> > >You are right. I didn't even read the response carefully. It is funny that >Bard got it right the second time and ChatGPT messed up. > >This shows you need to check these responses carefully. The chatbots are >far from reliable now. They are improving rapidly. > >Despite the problems, the latest version of ChatGPT reportedly passed a bar >exam that it previously failed. See: > >https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/latest-version-of-chatgpt-aces-the-bar-exam-with-score-in-90th-percentile Cloud storage:- Unsafe, Slow, Expensive ...pick any three.
