It's kind of crazy how the brain works. It parses your complaints and then when I wake up I see things even more clear. So the addition to the setup are that we need to constrain interactions in the rest frame of the current moving at C (you can consider a limiting argument to make this stringent) now I think that in this reference frame we will need the parallel line segments to be also located so that the line connecting them are orthogonal to the stream. This simplifies many things and I assumed this without stating it clearly. This has some implications for the decomposition of the 3 quark systems. First of all we only consider systems where there are two paths that are parallel and that you can do. And then make a similar system so that we do get the triangulation we are after and can get the argument done (as all three are not lined up in that example). This is possible if everything is symmetrized.
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 9:05 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote: > Also the potential is not correct... > > If you do it quark like 2/3 2/3 -1/3 you will get 2*(2/9) - 4/9 = 0! > because 2/3 are repulsive... > > You should always write down all details of what you exactly name how and > what e.g. potential means. > > The Dirac equation is plain nonsense as the e/p magnetic moment field (the > strongest of all) is missing. Also the 3 rotation solution is unphysical > for mass... > > So going on with old garbage just produces a new flavor of old garbage... > > J.W. > On 06.05.2023 20:21, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: > > You are right, the paths are more complex than just on a sphere, we build > it up as an addition of such paths. > > On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 8:00 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote: > >> Stefan >> >> There is no such thing as a common velocity for 3 different points on a >> sphere except for one axes angular motion (w instead of v) >> >> >> J.W. >> >> On 06.05.2023 15:33, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote: >> > I think the following paper illustrate an avenue to find the >> > connection between EM and QM now take this link and explain Aspects >> > experiment... How come we can define a normal 2000 century model and >> > end up with no determinism and whatnot strangities. >> > >> > >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/14G9U_Iee4jsppn0Rcp4A5BBrGDRkR5tC/view?usp=drivesdk >> > >> > I will blog in easier to understand format later. But really it's not >> > a difficult stude, which is a good thing in my mind. >> >> -- >> Jürg Wyttenbach >> Bifangstr. 22 >> 8910 Affoltern am Albis >> >> +41 44 760 14 18 >> +41 79 246 36 06 >> >> -- > Jürg Wyttenbach > Bifangstr. 22 > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > +41 44 760 14 18 > +41 79 246 36 06 > >
