Hello Nick,
Nick Palmer wrote:
> Firstly, I did not say that there is no THERMAL noise (obviously there
> is from the Brownian motion) I said that there is no thermally induced
> effective *voltage* noise when there is no current flowing.
If you want to learn about thermal noise then create a Spice simulation circuit.
When you feel you have a circuit generating true voltage noise *only* when
there's current, lol, then post the Spice circuit. You are in for a surprise
when you learn how EE's simulate true voltage noise. BTW, true voltage noise
has no upper voltage crest limit. I would suggest LTSpice/SwitcherCAD by Linear
technology if you want a nice professional free spice program -->
http://ltspice.linear.com/software/swcadiii.exe
http://www.linear.com/designtools/softwareRegistration.jsp
LTSpice and Linear technology are well viewed in EE world. If you need help
creating a voltage noise source then the EE's at LTSpice Yahoo Groups can help -->
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/LTspice/
Please, just don't tell them what you told us, otherwise they may laugh and
ignore you.
I read your entire recent post and I am sorry, but your logic is flawed beyond
repair.
p.s., I've worked with voltage noise sources on Spice programs far too many
times in addition to building real circuits. LTSpice is very accurate. Such
thermal voltage noise causes real current, which is caused by random electron
vibrations. If you truly want to understand the elementary physics behind such
noise then write a computer program, which will demonstrate how a peak random
source doubles when four random sources are added in series. Random noises
caused by all vibrating electrons don't cancel. Thermal noise is real voltage.
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>
> Paul wrote:
>> I have a question for both Michel Jullian and Stephen A. Lawrence.
>> Could you please state if you are presently working on so-called "Free
>> Energy" technology? My definition of "Free Energy" obviously would
>> not include the initial cost or cost of maintenance.
>
> No, never said I was.
Michel Jullian wrote:
> My involvement in new energy is non-public, and concerns principally the
electrical and chemical aspects of determining a system's energy balance.
I would interpret your answers as, "You are not working on Free Energy
technology." Then may I ask "What's your purpose or goal at Vo?"
Believe it or not, kind regards,
Paul Lowrance
