David Thomson wrote:
> I think I'm getting tired of trying to show people the Aether Physics Model.
> I'm ready to just turn within and work on my own development and let people
> discover the answers to physics for themselves.
Sorry to jump in, as my time only permits me to follow my own threads at Vo.
I'm not taking sides with anyone, but had a few pennies to toss in.
I'm not a QM specialist, but I know something about QM. In QM the vacuum or
empty space is not empty. This is very clear in quantum physics. This is
called the vacuum energy, which is the lowest possible energy, the ground state.
In QM there are violations in the conservation of energy, but such violations
occurs only for brief moment in time.
Some may refer to such quantum fluctuations as Aether, which is fine. Although
most physicists have a problem with that since there were so many flavors of
Aether theories over time. Personally I think it would be respectful to title
quantum space as Aether.
Also in QM there are virtual particles, which would interest Aether theorists,
since such virtual particles are the cause for the coulomb force, strong nuclear
force, weak nuclear force, spontaneous emission of photons, Casimir effect, van
der Waals force, Vacuum polarization, Lamb shift, and Hawking radiation.
Theories are great, but a theory usually receives death ears from the science
community until such a theory can correctly predict all known effects and
experiments such as -->
* Single electron double slit experiment.
* Single photon double slit experiment.
* Delayed choice experiment.
* Van der Waals' forces.
* Zel'dovich radiation.
* Cherenkov radiation.
* Hawking radiation.
* Quantum tunnelling.
* Casimir effect.
* Unruh effect.
* Quantum Hall Effect.
* Quantum Zeno effect.
* Quantum confinement effect.
* Aharonov-Bohm effect.
* Compton effect.
* Photoelectric effect.
* Primakoff effect.
* Scharnhorst effect.
* Zeeman effect.
* Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect.
* Schottky effect.
* Peltier-Seebeck effect.
* Mössbauer effect.
* Meissner effect.
* Leidenfrost effect.
* Kaye effect.
* Josephson effect.
* Ferroelectric effect.
* Faraday effect.
* Biefeld-Brown effect, also known as electrohydrodynamics (EHD).
Furthermore, the theory must use an accurate and stable method of predicting
such theories such as mathematics or computer software.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
