----- Original Message ----- From: "Jones Beene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 1:36 PM Subject: [Vo]:Re: "Cold" electricity, I'm confused...
> You think you're confused ... > > --- Michel Jullian wrote: > >> Mmmm... are you confused or > floccinaucinihilipilificating the phenomenon? > > Both... ;=) > > First. It's strange that for some reason I never get > messages posted by our moderator-- and Bill's post > still is not in the archives. Parallel realities? Bill exists in mine, and his posts do show up in the archives... ;-) > Let me just say this for now: that the only difference > between this and the similar phenomenon of the Tesla > coil firing a LED is 19,999 volts ;-). The milliamp > current input is about the same. mas o menos. Not > trying to be funny but the two phenomena may be FAR > more similar than you think... read on. > > As to what 'cold electricity' really is - it is hard > to say until more is known, but if I had to guess > now, it would seem that the LEDs are NOT being powered > ONLY by the circuit (in a manner of speaking) but that > they are being 'opened' or 'stimulated' by the > circuit's pure potential (no measurable current there) > and that the 'real power' is external to the circuit > !!! Which reminds me of my question to Ron, or anybody who knows: how are input and output powers measured, this hasn't been answered satisfactorily yet, you can't measure a power by just the voltage across (or equivalently the current in) a resistor in the input or output circuit... agreed? > Obviously that creates further identity problems, but > I am leaning towards the solar neutino flux as being > the 'real power' and that the LED is being stimulated > to operate as a gateway for forcing electron > anti-nuetrino "oscillations". > > That is because the bandgap of these LEDs is so close > to the best estimates of the mass-energy of solar > neutrinos = around 3.4 eV. > > More later. I am just 'sleep-writing' at 4am now. In my reality, only one hour after you wrote it's well past lunchtime... how strange? I guess I must be nap-writing ;-) Michel > > Jones > > How can anyone sleep when the world of physics, as we > know it, may be magically changing before our eyes... > or else these old eyes are changing before a static > world. It's all relative... don't you know, or don't > ya'?
