On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > *From:* John Berry > ... on the contrary, this is probably the "only" board on the net (one of > the few, anyway), where there are enough open-minded scientists and serious > thinkers to give these subjects a measure of due-diligence, yet without the > gullible naivete of the new-age mentality, nor the automatic rejection of > the ivory-tower pedants. I can think of no other for the subjects you > mention. > Neither can I but I don't believe that it is an ideal balance of those 2 qualities either. While I am glad I have attracted some quality replies I do wish there was some more attention to the variable capacity overunity research however. > > > That is probably why the political issues cut so deep here. But let's not > go there ;-) > > Sure, there are plenty of sites populated by enthusiastic but average > commentators, or else by overly-educated professorial types, where these > subjects receive either zero acceptance or zero criticism, but that is not > why most of us tune-in here, on occasion. > > Case in point: read Bill B's comments on "orgone" if it is still available > online, yet transposing the word "hydrino" in places where it could fit, > realizing that well over half of the online information purporting to be on > orgone is totally bogus and the accurate information may relate to a real > particle. > I may look into that, I have my own appreciation for the real functioning of such. > > This may enlighten your understanding of two very nebulous species, if you > separate fact from fiction. The key trait to appreciate this forum can be > call "discrimination" of the good-kind ... (plus having a good kill-filter) > ... and being able to sort out the small-% of wheat from the large excess of > chaff ... so to speak. > Jones, have you read my variable capacitor post, subject: On Topic in any detail? If so can I have your opinion on it? I think it was you that actually identified the patent co-invented by JLN?
