On Sep 29, 2009, at 12:00 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:

2009/9/28 Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net>:

On Sep 27, 2009, at 5:49 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
One thing that could be done now, and probably wouldn't be a waste would
be
algoil. This could make a significant dent in fossil fuel consumption, and because it targets cars and trucks, isn't likely to be quickly replaced by
CF,
even if that does pan out.

Yes, it is another viable form of solar energy that is plodding along in
development.

Not nearly as viable as PV though, at least not on land, if you
consider land productivity. According to the attached "How far a car
can drive" graph, PV is 50 times more productive than the most
productive biofuel: one hectare (= 100m x 100m = 2.5 acres) of land
allows a car to drive 20-70 thousand km on biofuel, versus 3 million
km with PV. Source:
http://www.nanosolar.com/company/blog/going-all-electric.

Michel<FuelEfficiency.jpg>

I think algae will have its day. It will be an important energy source for quite a while. The numbers given in the above table distort the potential algae has. See:

http://www.oilgae.com/ref/report/digest/digest.html

"The yields of oil and fuels from algae are much higher (10-100 times) than competing energy crops"

Algae oil yields are already incredible compared to other bio-oil. See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_biofuel_crop_yields

This oil can be blended with other oils to power truck and aircraft, which is a niche photoelectric will be hard pressed to fill for a long while.

Presently it is all a matter of economics:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodiesel

"Algae fuel yields have not yet been accurately determined, but DOE is reported as saying that algae yield 30 times more energy per acre than land crops such as soybeans.[52] Yields of 36 tonnes/hectare are considered practical by Ami Ben-Amotz of the Institute of Oceanography in Haifa, who has been farming Algae commercially for over 20 years.[53]"

"Photosynthesis is known to have an efficiency rate of about 3-6% of total solar radiation[57] and if the entire mass of a crop is utilized for energy production, the overall efficiency of this chain is currently about 1%[58] While this may compare unfavorably to solar cells combined with an electric drive train, biodiesel is less costly to deploy..."

So, I agree that ultimately it is true that other more efficient solar energy collection systems, including photovoltaics, will eventually take over the majority of energy production (given no new energy breakthrough such as CF), a considerable infrastructure needs to be produced to handle all aspects of energy needs, including aircraft and trucking fuels.) For some time to come it appears algae will have an economic energy niche, as well as other applications, such as sewage processing, and food production. Eventually, algae, which can grow in salt water, may eventually prove to be too valuable as a food or fertilizer source to waste on energy production.

Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/




Reply via email to