There are many interesting aspects to this. I am particularly intriqued by what provokes punishment:
http://www.its.caltech.edu/~qoptics/beerfund.html in what appears to be an odd feedback mechanism. Terry On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Very interesting observation, Frank. > > > > Don’t forget Horace’s model of a deflated species… or the Dufour “hydrex” > and there are others. Robin has a ‘faux D’ … and “deuterium clusters” are > not far off - it would be informative to try to get together a complete > listing with emphasis on the likenesses and differences. > > > > We kind of like … err … looking at shadows on the cave wall, or whatever > that metaphor is… > > > > … and the Caltech paper is provocative. This is all coming together > > > > > > > > From: Frank > > > > On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:21:44 -0800 Jones Beene said > > > > [snip] OK. Many of us are now using f/H to mean "generic fractional > hydrogen", > > since Mills has trademarked the 'Hydrino' name, and is now trying to enforce > > the (tm), but in any event RM did not get the theory precisely correct, so > > how about this - ta-da: The "f/Husor" ? [end snip] > > > > Researchers a Rose by any other > name… > > What Kitamura, A., et al refer to as “anomalously large isotope effect” > what Arata /Zhang calls "pycnodeuterium", > what Mills is calling a "hydrino" > Caltech "one-dimensional > atom" > generic “fractional state > hydrogen” > Naudts (full integer equations) “relativistic hydrogen.” > > > > Does what Caltech calls a "one-dimensional atom" belong on the above list? > > Cavity QED with squeezed vacuum > http://www.its.caltech.edu/~qoptics/squeeze.html > The excitation of an atom by squeezed or other nonclassical radiation should > give rise to fundamentally new radiative processes. For example, since > radiative decay widths and level shifts of atoms are associated with the > statistical properties of the vacuum ("vacuum fluctuations"), then an atom > in a squeezed vacuum should not have a single relaxation rate, but rather > two rates associated with the enhanced and diminished fluctuations of a > squeezed state relative to the vacuum state. In an experiment conducted by > our group, this phase sensitivity due to the squeezed vacuum was in fact > observed. Squeezed vacuum states, created with an optical parametric > oscillator, were coupled to the atom with high efficiency. This efficient > atom-vacuum coupling, essential to the experiment, was achieved through the > techniques of cavity QED: by coupling the atom strongly to the fundamental > mode of a high-finesse optical cavity, a "one-dimensional atom" was created. > > > > Regards > > Fran
