True, Robin, but Cold Fusion was D + D fusion, this one cannot be Peter On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:05 AM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Sat, 22 Jan 2011 06:40:13 +0200: > Hi, > [snip] > >The DN paper is an exercise in logical fallacies. And it shows how facts > can > >be ignored. Only the press says that what happened is cold fusion > >i.e. fusion at cold, due to its (the press') inherent sensationalism. The > >world is infinitely interesting, the press wants to describe it as even > more > >interesting. But Rossi has told that what takes place in his device is NOT > >cold fusion. > > Any reaction that joins atomic nuclei together is fusion. > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html > >
