Robert Duncan interview on Cash-Flow: “Public investment means 
public ownership.”

https://coldfusionnow.wordpress.com/2011/02/06/robert-duncan-interview-on-cash-flow-public-investment-means-public-ownership/


http://tinyurl.com/4hwlbns

“It’s interesting that when this was reviewed in 2004 by the National Academy 
of 
Sciences, the NAS came back and recommended that well-controlled experiments in 
cold fusion be funded by public money just to avoid the the problem you’re 
mentioning and what surprises me is not only did that never happen, when you go 
and look at Wikipedia and other sources they’ll say that when this was reviewed 
by the government in 2004, they came to essentially the same conclusions as 
1989. Well that’s not true. In 1989, there was alot more angst and people were 
ready to pronounce it completely a debunked area of research.”
 
“But in 2004, that committee came back and said where well-controlled 
experiments can be defined, they should be funded. But none have, to my 
knowledge, on public money. And that’s unfortunate, because just as you say, if 
the public invests in it, then the public owns it, whereas if its privately 
invested in, then you have to find some means like a patent to respect the 
private equity of those that have put either their money or other people’s 
money 
on the line.”
 
 
Harry



Reply via email to