Fwd: Bologna 14-jan-11 test on Rossi E-cat: Franco Mattei: Rich Murray
2011.02.09

[ permission given to forward ]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Franco Mattei <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 6:00 AM
Subject: Bologna 14-jan-11 test on Rossi E-cat
To: [email protected]

Dear Rich Murray,

I follow with interest the debate on Rossi’s catalyzer on vortex-l.

I see that you are very careful in analyzing the data from the
14-jan-2011 experiment, so I would like to know your opinion on the
following aspect.

I don’t know whether or not the E-cat really produces such a lot of excess heat.

I am not a CF expert nor a professor, I am still studying.

I hope it does, so we can solve all our energy problems, especially
here in Italy.

But I have a doubt.
Looking carefully to the jpg photos that can be downloaded from this
website 
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/01/bolognia-14111-cronaca-test-fusione_14.html
,
there are a couple of small incongruities, with respect to Prof. Levi report:

1 – the water pump appears to be very similar to LMI series J5,
but this model delivers only 7.6 L/H
(see 
http://hawkins.thomasnet.com/viewitems/lmi-metering-pumps/series-j5-12vdc-electronic-metering-pumps
);

2 – the RH-probe for vapor analysis,
that  I presume is the rod emerging from the top of the catalyzer,
looks to be much longer of HP474AC model
(see http://www.fattore.fi/33%20EXTECH/Extech%20ilmaVIRTAUSmittarit08.htm ).
It looks more similar to SPC C-45-0500 BEX probe
( see http://www.fattore.fi/thermopari.html ),
but this last is for temperature only (up to 1200°C).
What do you think?
Am I wrong?
And, if not, how much important could these differences be for the
result of the Bologna test?

Thank you and best regards, Franco

Reply via email to