The difference is, your plan depends on the device working. His may not. On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Peter Gluck wrote: > >> As regarding Rossi's bad PR he is just following Pitigrilli's "Do not give >> me advices, I can err myself" The lack of a theory is disturbing, his method >> of scale-up is strange, but he answers patiently to hundreds of questions of >> diverse levels of IQ and good/ill-will. Put yourself in his place. What >> could be an optimal strategy for him? >> > > 1. Stop responding to all those hundreds of messages. His responses confuse > the issue. They contradict one another. In some cases they are flat out > factually wrong. > > 2. Hire the best patent firm money can buy. Have them write a bullet-proof > patent. The ones Rossi himself writes are ridiculous and would never > withstand a challenge. > > 3. Make 2 or 3 machine and put them in major corporations and labs such as > the NRL, which has a test-bed facility designed for a machine of this size > and scale. (They described it at ICCF-16.) Have the corporations and the NRL > write authoritative reports describing their verification procedures. > > 4. Have some national labs verify the transmutations. > > 5. Take the reports and transmutation data to the Patent Office. They will > have no choice but to grant the patent. That is what experts in patents have > told me. > > 6. License the technology to any corporation on earth that wants to build > it. Let the corporations, regulators, and governments handle the details. > > 7. Sit back and count the money. Don't worry about opposition or public > relations; the corporations that want to manufacture the machine will take > care of it. Don't worry about a thing -- just count the money. > > Let me summarize the difference in scale and intent between Rossi's > business plans and what I propose. Rossi plans to cross the channel from > England to France with a dozen of his friends for a day-trip picnic at the > shore. I propose the D-Day Normandy Invasion. Rossi's plans will fail, for > several reasons, such as the fact that you cannot install a nuclear reactor > that works for unknown reasons, and the fact that many powerful forces > ranging from the APS, the DoE and the fossil fuel industry will be > determined to crush him. My plans will succeed because I propose to bring > much the power of the establishment to his side, in an alliance working in > his favor. Rossi and that small company in Greece alone have no chance of > defeating Exxon Mobile. Rossi plus Mitsubishi, General Electric and the > People's Republic of China will go through Exxon Mobile like shit through a > goose. > > My plan has many advantages to making a 1 MW reactor. It will be much > faster. His plan will take decades to have a minor effect; mine would > bankrupt the fossil fuel industry in a decade. My plan is far cheaper for > him to implement. It cannot accidentally irradiate and kill hundreds of > residents of Florida (possibly thousands). It will earn him orders of > magnitude more money -- assuming his present plans make any money at all, > which seems unlikely to me. It is the conventional, tried-and-true way to > make money with intellectual property. > > - Jed > >
