Jones, Is dark matter another label for "ether" that surges with ebbs and flows that 3D beings cannot perceive except by relativistic measure? And even then only by difference in scaling factors between frames since at the macro scale the ebb and flow is homogenous? Do differences in energy density afforded by your spillover catalyst reflect very local changes in this flow rate? Not that spillover hydrogen would cause additional collisions to be detected but might provide another method to derive information about the flow by establishing calibrated geometry and fractional hydrogen - perhaps using a closed cavity - that would reveal seasonal changes in the rate - all assuming the premise of relativistic hydrogen is correct. Regards Fran
-----Original Message----- From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 10:48 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Watts-up with 28, 30, 33 day cycles? Here is an implication of the story: The detector they use comprises a 440-gram crystal of germanium... dark matter is so abundant that 100 million particles of it are expected to pass through the CoGeNT detector every second... OK - Terry may be imagining the same thing that I am - that if "dark matter" really exists in such a large flux deep in a cave (it is less than neutrinos but very large nevertheless) - then all that one needs to do to capture plenty of it - is simply to design a better ANTENNA to collect it. Many things have been tried, and a crystal of germanium is a poor antenna. Extremely poor. Time to think outside the box. Leading one to wonder ... hmmm ... if perhaps "spillover hydrogen" captured in a nickel matrix is that sought-after "antenna for dark matter." Jones -----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton And dark matter is seasonal: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20434-second-experiment-hints-at-seaso nal-dark-matter-signal.html T
